Hi Tony,
On 10/19/2010 1:00 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@xxxxxx> [101018 13:42]:
Hi Nishanth,
On 10/18/2010 8:09 PM, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-
owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Benoit Cousson
Ping? Is there a possibility for a v2 non-rfc ES2 support?
And what about a RFC v2? With ES2 support of course :-)
The changes I have done are breaking RX51 support due to the usage
of low-level API from the mux code.
For the moment I just disabled that code from the RX51, so there is
no way I send that except in a RFC form :-(
I have some ideas on doing the board specific runtime remuxing.
That should also solve the rx51 emmc remuxing.
That's cool, I had some poor ideas as well, but I was not sure you will
like them :-)
Let's plan on merging your patches first after the merge window,
then I'll do my patches on top of yours to avoid rebasing.
Great, I'll send that when I will have the time to test that on an ES2.0
at least...
Just FYI, the wip code is there:
git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git ctrl-wip/mux-omap4-v2
Thanks,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
