RE: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap: Ptr "isr_reg" tracked as NULL was dereferenced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evgeny Kuznetsov [mailto:EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:35 PM
> To: tony@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Balbi, Felipe; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Varadarajan,
> Charulatha; tero.kristo@xxxxxxxxx; ext-eugeny.kuznetsov@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap: Ptr "isr_reg" tracked as NULL was
> dereferenced
> 
> From: Evgeny Kuznetsov <ext-eugeny.kuznetsov@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Value of "isr_reg" pointer is depend on configuration and GPIO method.
> Potentially it may have NULL value and it is dereferenced later
> in code. If pointer is NULL there is some kernel issue.

Can you elaborate?

> Warning and exit from function are added in this case.
> Also compilation check is added for correct architecture
> configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Evgeny Kuznetsov <EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> index c05c653..d04913c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> @@ -1318,6 +1318,23 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	if (bank->method == METHOD_GPIO_44XX)
>  		isr_reg = bank->base + OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUS0;
>  #endif
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1) &&		\
> +		!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX) &&	\
> +		!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) &&	\
> +		!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730) &&	\
> +		!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850) &&	\
> +		!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) &&	\
> +		!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) &&	\
> +		!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
> +
> +#error "Incorrect arch configuration"

This is not required. If the architecture is not one of the above
mentioned, gpio_irq_handler() will not be used/called at all.

Also all the possible gpio methods for a given OMAP architecture are
already considered with "#ifdef"s and (bank->method) checks in
gpio_irq_handler().

> +
> +#endif
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!isr_reg))
> +		goto exit;

For the above mentioned reason, this isr_reg would be non-NULL. Have
you observed this error anytime?

Also, the omap-gpio code has similar code spread all over and has to be
anyway cleaned-up. Is there any reason why gpio_irq_handler() alone is
addressed in this patch?

> +
>  	while(1) {
>  		u32 isr_saved, level_mask = 0;
>  		u32 enabled;
> @@ -1377,6 +1394,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	configured, we must unmask the bank interrupt only after
>  	handler(s) are executed in order to avoid spurious bank
>  	interrupt */
> +exit:
>  	if (!unmasked)
>  		desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> 
> --
> 1.6.3.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux