RE: [PATCHv3 1/17] OMAP2/3/4:dmtimer:add device names to flck nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benoit,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cousson, Benoit
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:54 PM
> To: Varadarajan, Charulatha
> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gopinath, Thara; Basak, Partha; DebBarma,
> Tarun Kanti; Paul Walmsley; Tony Lindgren; Kevin Hilman
> Subject: RE: [PATCHv3 1/17] OMAP2/3/4:dmtimer:add device names to flck
> nodes
> 
> Hi Charu,
> 
> >From: Varadarajan, Charulatha
> >Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 7:27 AM
> >
> >Benoit,
> >
> >> >
> >> > This patch adds device name info to OMAP2 dmtimer fclk nodes so
> >>
> >> You should avoid using "that patch" in a changelog, since we already
> >> know it is a patch.
> >>
> >> You can read 4.c in "The perfect patch" from Andrew Morton:
> >> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt
> >>
> >
> >Referring to 6.b section in the above link, is it a bad idea to have
> >a cover-letter? Should we better include the content of introductory
> >email in patch 1 of any patch series?
> 
> I saw it as well, and was a little bit surprised at first.
> But if you look carefully the rational, it makes sense if you do not take
> care about the content of the cover-letter.
> 
>    > Please don't do this.  There is no facility in the git tree to carry
>    > changelog-only changesets such as this (or at least, we don't do
> that) so
>    > the information in the introductory email will be lost.
>    >
>    > So I end up copying and pasting your nice introduction into the
>    > changelog for the first patch, so it gets into git.  I'll follow it
> with
>    > the text
> 
> Here the concern is that some important information can be in the cover-
> letter but not in the patch changelog, so they will be lost.
> That issue does not appear if you use the cover-letter only to summarize
> the patches changelog and to provide the history or the various patch
> series revision.
> At the end the history and the patch series revision should no go into the
> changelog anyway, so it is perfectly fine to lose them.
> 
> Bottom-line, keep doing cover-letter to summarize the series, but do not
> put information that should belong to the patch changelog only.
> 
Ok, I will take care.
-tarun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux