RE: [PATCH v1 11/16] OMAP3: hwmod DSS: RFBI Move init,exit to driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Petazzoni [mailto:thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 1:17 AM
> To: Guruswamy, Senthilvadivu
> Cc: khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx; paul@xxxxxxxxx;
> Hiremath, Vaibhav; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/16] OMAP3: hwmod DSS: RFBI Move init,exit to
> driver
> 
> Hello Senthil,
> 
> On Wed,  6 Oct 2010 16:44:54 +0530
> Guruswamy Senthilvadivu <svadivu@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/rfbi.c
> b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/rfbi.c
> > index 23598ea..9bee39d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/rfbi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/rfbi.c
> > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static int rfbi_convert_timings(struct rfbi_timings
> *t);
> >  static void rfbi_get_clk_info(u32 *clk_period, u32 *max_clk_div);
> >
> >  static struct {
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> >  	void __iomem	*base;
> >
> >  	unsigned long	l4_khz;
> > @@ -142,11 +143,22 @@ static inline u32 rfbi_read_reg(const struct
> rfbi_reg idx)
> >  /* RFBI HW IP initialisation */
> >  static int omap_rfbihw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > -	return 0;
> > +	int r;
> > +	rfbi.pdev = pdev;
> > +
> > +	r = rfbi_init();
> > +	if (r) {
> > +		DSSERR("Failed to initialize rfbi\n");
> > +		goto err_rfbi;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +err_rfbi:
> > +	return r;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int omap_rfbihw_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > +	rfbi_exit();
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> 
> Instead of having probe() and remove() functions that call the existing
> init() and exit(), why not making your driver look like most Linux
> drivers here, and directly do the initialization in probe() and the
> cleanup in remove() ?
> 
[Senthil] When I do existing code movement I don't change it one single patch just to make the review concentrate on the place of movement.  
I could submit additional patches to remove the extra function calls wherever required.
> Concerning the added pdev field to the rfbi structure, do you really it
> at this point ?
> 
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
> Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
> development, consulting, training and support.
> http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux