On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:58:32PM -0500, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx> [101001 14:38]:
Tony, all,
The OMAP3430 ES1.0 was pretty much a test chip, with the only known board
being the 3430ES1.0 SDP. There are only a small number of these boards
outside TI and within TI, they've likely never been used in over 2 years.
It's unlikely that these boards still work on mainline, and likely have
been broken in linux-omap since the very beginning.
Between ES1.0 and ES2.0 we've had several major changes in the clock
nodes,
and IPs. However we're still keeping code/data on these in the kernel
today.
Since all later OMAP3 chips have been very similar to ES2.0, it probably
makes sense to drop support for the ES1.0. This would result in a small
but probably significant reduction in the current code. If you're okay
with dropping this support, we can slowly start working on this.
What do you think?
No thanks!
yeah, I don't like the idea of simply dropping support either and would
be very happy if I had an old h2 board to fix up the omap_udc.c code
which is horrible :-p
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
