> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cousson, Benoit
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 3:26 PM
> To: Varadarajan, Charulatha
> Cc: tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; wim@xxxxxxxxx; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paul@xxxxxxxxx; Nayak, Rajendra; Basak,
> Partha; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] OMAP4: hwmod data: Add watchdog timer
>
> Hi Charu,
>
> On 9/17/2010 11:23 AM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Cousson, Benoit
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:49 AM
> >> To: Varadarajan, Charulatha
> >> Cc: tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; wim@xxxxxxxxx; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paul@xxxxxxxxx; Nayak, Rajendra; Basak,
> >> Partha; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] OMAP4: hwmod data: Add watchdog timer
> >>
> >> Hi Charu,
> >>
> >> On 9/15/2010 7:26 AM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
> >>> From: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@xxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Add watchdog timer hwmod data for OMAP4 chip
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@xxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu@xxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> > <<snip>>
> >
> >>> @@ -472,6 +538,8 @@ static __initdata struct omap_hwmod
> >> *omap44xx_hwmods[] = {
> >>>
> >>> /* mpu class */
> >>> &omap44xx_mpu_hwmod,
> >>> + /* wd_timer class */
> >>> + &omap44xx_wd_timer2_hwmod,
> >>> NULL,
> >>> };
> >>
> >> What about the wd_timer3? It is in the audio backend, and I'm not sure
> >> who will use it, but it does exist.
> >
> > As you mentioned, wd_timer3 in OMAP4 is an IVA3 watchdog timer.
> >
> > Also the current watchdog driver (omap_wdt.c) does not support more than
> one watchdog timer. To add this support we need to first redesign the
> driver code and then add wd_timer3 to the database.
> >
> > This patch series is intended to make watchdog driver to use omap_hwmod
> APIs and PM runtime APIs. Driver modification to support more than one
> watchdog timers can be taken up as a separate activity later.
>
> No necessarily, even if you do not manage this watchdog, we do need to
> expose its hwmod in order to allow dspbridge/syslink to potentially
> enable or disable it.
>
> Maybe, it should be up to syslink people to do that then.
> In that case, please add comment in the DB to explain that we do have
> other instances but they are not managed yet.
Okay. Sure will do that.
>
> Thanks,
> Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
