>>-----Original Message----- >>From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 9:33 PM >>To: Gopinath, Thara >>Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paul@xxxxxxxxx; Cousson, Benoit; Sripathy, Vishwanath; Sawant, Anand; >>Derrick, David >>Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/8] OMAP3: PM: Adding smartreflex device file. >> >>"Gopinath, Thara" <thara@xxxxxx> writes: >> >>[...] >> >>>>>> + sr_data->device_enable = omap_device_enable; >>>>>> + sr_data->device_shutdown = omap_device_shutdown; >>>>>> + sr_data->device_idle = omap_device_idle; >>>>> >>>>>Please drop these and use runtime PM as suggested in previous patch. >>> >>> At this stage I am not sure whether we should make smartreflex patches >>> dependent on runtime pm. I would like to do the conversion once and for all >>> once runtime pm is up streamed. >> >>Using runtime PM instead of the sr_data-> calls will simplify this >>patch. >> >>Also, runtime PM core for OMAP will be merged this merge window. If you >>use my 'pm-core' branch for testing, you will have it included in your >>baseline, along with all the other things that are targeted for merge in >>2.6.37. Is this branch latest kernel + stuff targeted for 2.6.37 ?? Regards Thara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
