* Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [100903 05:07]: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren > > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 1:00 AM > > To: Russell King - ARM Linux > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > Bryan Wu; Will Deacon > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi- > > omap > > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [100902 09:16]: > > > From c04a57fc3b41d886f56ccdc27cf9758de0c95202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:33:23 +0300 > > > Subject: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi- > > omap > > > > > > Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap > > > > Here's this one updated to use !smp_cpu() instead of smp_on_up(). > > Looks like the description and subject needed some refreshing too. > > > As I commented on other patch we should just avoid doing anything > When the CPU is not OMAP4. Looks like the only fix needed now is the localtimer fix. Posted a patch that uses cpu_is_omap44xx() to test for that. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
