Re: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [100903 05:07]:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-
> > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 1:00 AM
> > To: Russell King - ARM Linux
> > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > Bryan Wu; Will Deacon
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-
> > omap
> > 
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [100902 09:16]:
> > > From c04a57fc3b41d886f56ccdc27cf9758de0c95202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:33:23 +0300
> > > Subject: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-
> > omap
> > >
> > > Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap
> > 
> > Here's this one updated to use !smp_cpu() instead of smp_on_up().
> > Looks like the description and subject needed some refreshing too.
> > 
> As I commented on other patch we should just avoid doing anything
> When the CPU is not OMAP4. 

Looks like the only fix needed now is the localtimer fix. Posted
a patch that uses cpu_is_omap44xx() to test for that.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux