Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > Kevin Hilman had written, on 09/02/2010 12:47 PM, the following: [...] >> >> If you look at the current PM branch (specifically pm-sr), you'll see >> that with the updated SR layer, there is no SR enable/disable in the >> idle path because there is no voltage scaling during idle. [...] >> >> That being said, even if this is add later, the idle path can potentialy >> call the SR API directly if needed for the enable/disable. > > not clean if it was directly implemented by regulator framework > The idea (so far) is that there will still be a low-level SmartReflex API, and just a regulator "wrapper." Thomas P. is experimenting with extending the regulator framework to be able to call into external low-level code which does the heavy lifting. He can probably post an RFC soon. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
