"Kalliguddi, Hema" <hemahk@xxxxxx> writes:
>>> static int musb_platform_resume(struct musb *musb)
>>> {
>>> u32 l;
>>> + struct device *dev = musb->controller;
>>> + struct musb_hdrc_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>>
>>> if (!musb->clock)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> otg_set_suspend(musb->xceiv, 0);
>>> -
>>> - if (musb->set_clock)
>>> - musb->set_clock(musb->clock, 1);
>>> - else
>>> - clk_enable(musb->clock);
>>> -
>>> - l = musb_readl(musb->mregs, OTG_SYSCONFIG);
>>> - l &= ~ENABLEWAKEUP; /* disable wakeup */
>>> - musb_writel(musb->mregs, OTG_SYSCONFIG, l);
>>> -
>>> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>>> + pdata->enable_wakeup(pdev);
>>
>>I think you mean ->disable_wakeup() here, right?
>>
>
> No I meant enable_wakeup only here. When smart idle/standby is enabled,
> wakeup bit has to be set to generate the s-wakeup when the devie is in idle
> and system is in ret.
OK, I'm confused.
The code being removed just above disables wakeups and the new code
enables wakeups.
Also, you don't ever call ->disable_wakeup() elsewhere in the patch.
You call pdata->enable_wakeup() both in suspend and resume.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
