Hi,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:10:22AM +0200, Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:03:44AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote:
No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the register offset
for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be 0xd or 0xe.
Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been changed to 0xe.
Typo. Earlier we were using 0xe and in the new implementation it has
been changed to 0xd.
you're right, I'm not sure how I came up with that value since the TRM
shows 0x0e, maybe a copy&paste error. Will change patch 1.
ok, it's because there's no register 0x0a. And I missed that when
defined the register space. Good catch, thanks. I wonder why it didn't
fail to write to that register address :-?
--
balbi
DefectiveByDesign.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
