>>-----Original Message----- >>From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx] >>Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:29 PM >>To: Gopinath, Thara >>Cc: Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki); Samuel Ortiz; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >>omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tony Lindgren; Andrew Morton >>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h >> >>On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:32:57AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote: >>>R_PROTECT_KEY offset is 0xE where as the new TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY >>>is defined as 0xd. I have not checked the trm to see which is correct. But >> >>you can use either 0xc0|0x0c or 0xce|0xec, both will work are unlock >>keys. No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the register offset for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be 0xd or 0xe. Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been changed to 0xe. Regards Thara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
