Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: OMAP: Beagle: revision detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:10:35 -0500
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Do you have any preference if the gpio allocation fails?  Right now
> it'll just halts, we could just return as Cx based board.. Which would
> be the route the current kernel would take without this patch...
> 
I think current code printing the error and letting the revision to be
zero or undefined is just fine. It's easier to debug if we let system
to continue booting instead of halting at early stage as there is no
any fatal risk with mmc gpio_wp if we cannot determine the revision.


-- 
Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux