* Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@xxxxxxxxx> [100817 09:27]:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:15:59 +0300
> Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100817 05:14]:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the sound-asoc tree got a conflict in
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c between commits
> > > 1c37553eb1778802f0e7b6730df36542752e801e ("omap: n8x0: Cleanup i2c1 and
> > > menelaus registration") and 69be0f6f4b8e3be992ab6a333a3a82e043784c52
> > > ("omap: n8x0: Register i2c2 and add board info with tlv320aic3xfor N810")
> > > from the omap tree and commit f0fba2ad1b6b53d5360125c41953b7afcd6deff0
> > > ("ASoC: multi-component - ASoC Multi-Component Support") from the
> > > sound-asoc tree.
> > >
> > > I couldn't figure this out, so I effectively reverted the part of the
> > > latter commit affecting that file. Is there no way that the latter
> > > commit can be broken up into smaller self contained pieces?
> >
> > Let's let Jarkko and Liam to queue these along with the other
> > ASoC patches, I'll drop them from omap for-next.
> >
> > Jarkko, can you please rebase them?
> >
> I think it's easier if you keep them in l-o for-next and I send a
> patch to ASoC multi-component removing board-n8x0.c changes.
>
> That way the N810 audio is usable in linux-omap before m-c merge and m-c
> patch touch less board files.
OK sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
