>From: Hiroshi DOYU [Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 12:27 AM >To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando >Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kanigeri, Hari >Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in alloc_iovm_area > >From: "ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <fernando.lugo@xxxxxx> >Subject: RE: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in alloc_iovm_area >Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:48:14 +0200 > >> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guzman Lugo, Fernando [fernando.lugo@xxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 10:51 PM >> To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: Hiroshi.DOYO@xxxxxxxxx; Kanigeri, Hari >> Subject: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in alloc_iovm_area >> >> From cc48c0adaee97c8385a356aefa5b64a51818b4fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840@xxxxxx> >> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:28:24 -0500 >> Subject: [PATCH] iommu: fix end address of vm area comparation in alloc_iovm_area >> >> End address of the vm area is “start + bytes -1”, >> not “start + byte”. This patch fixes that issue by doing >> an inclusive comparison with tmp->da_start. This issue >> was preventing allocate an area of size exactly the same >> than the free area. I did no change the value of da_end >> of each vm area because it is used to get area size in >> several places. > >Ok for me. Is this patch against the latest? not it isn't, but I don't think it could have issues applying. However I will resend it, base against the latest and include you ack. Regards, Fernando. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
