Hi all, While re working on the cpu revision patch, I came across these definitions: #define OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0 0x36300034 #define OMAP3630_REV_ES1_1 0x36300134 #define OMAP3630_REV_ES1_2 0x36300234 Contrast this with: #define OMAP3430_REV_ES1_0 0x34300034 #define OMAP3430_REV_ES2_0 0x34301034 #define OMAP3430_REV_ES2_1 0x34302034 I may have missed the discussion on this list, but wanted to quickly check if the difference in intended OR accidental. I do recognize that definitions for 3630 start at lower nibble, so they appear to be better choice. Best regards, Sanjeev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
