Felipe, > -----Original Message----- > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 11:33 AM > To: Kamoolkar, Mugdha > Cc: Hari Kanigeri; Ben Gardiner; Ramos Falcon, Ernesto; Uribe de Leon, > Armando; Menon, Nishanth; KulikovVasiliy; Sapiens, Rene; AndyShevchenko; > FelipeContreras; Ramirez Luna, Omar; OhadBen-Cohen; linux- > omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Uppal, Deepali > Subject: Re: dspbridge and the omapl1x > > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:00:05AM +0200, ext Kamoolkar, Mugdha wrote: > >One thing I would like to mention is that the DMM feature does require > >the slave DSP to have an MMU. The OMAPL1xx devices do not have MMU for > >the DSP. DMM cannot be implemented without the DSP having an MMU. > >Hence, even if you ported DSPBridge to OMAPL1xx devices, you could not > >make use of the DMM feature. > > > >However, you are correct that dynamic linking and loading is a feature > >that is available in DSPBridge, and which is missing in DSPLink, which > >could work on OMAPL1xx if you ported DSPBridge to OMAPL1xx > > please follow the Netiquette [1]. It's really difficult to follow > dspbridge threads. > > [1] http://www.elinux.org/Netiquette > Thanks! Live and learn ... > -- > balbi > > DefectiveByDesign.org Regards, Mugdha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
