Hi Thara,
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Gopinath, Thara wrote:
> >>>>+struct device *omap2_get_dsp_device(void)
> >>>>+{
> >>>>+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!dsp_dev);
> >>>>+ return dsp_dev;
> >>>>+}
> >>First of all, apologies for so late posting of the comment. IMHO it would be good to rename this API
> >>as omap2_get_iva_device. This is because OMAP4 has separate IVA and DSP devices and we will need to
> >>build the omap_device for both. If we could rename this as omap2_get_iva_device, we could introduce
> >>another API omap4_get_iva_device until bridge starts doing a omap_device_build for all these devices.
>
> Hello Paul,
>
> Any thoughts on this one?
Makes sense to me. Probably we should queue a patch up to fix that for
2.6.37...
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
