On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:25:28PM -0700, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Yes it is a problem, as Russell has brought up, but there's something > I probably haven't communicated well. I'll use the following example: > > There are 3 devices: A CPU, a decoder and a video output device. All 3 > devices need to map the same 12 MB buffer at the same time. Why do you need the same buffer mapped by the CPU? Let's take your example of a video decoder and video output device. Surely the CPU doesn't want to be writing to the same memory region used for the output picture as the decoder is writing to. So what's the point of mapping that memory into the CPU's address space? Surely the video output device doesn't need to see the input data to the decoder either? Surely, all you need is: 1. a mapping for the CPU for a chunk of memory to pass data to the decoder. 2. a mapping for the decoder to see the chunk of memory to receive data from the CPU. 3. a mapping for the decoder to see a chunk of memory used for the output video buffer. 4. a mapping for the output device to see the video buffer. So I don't see why everything needs to be mapped by everything else. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
