On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:55:15AM -0700, Michael Bohan wrote: > > On 7/16/2010 12:58 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> As the patch has been out for RFC since early April on the linux-arm-kernel >> mailing list (Subject: [RFC] Prohibit ioremap() on kernel managed RAM), >> and no comments have come back from Qualcomm folk. > > Would it be unreasonable to allow a map request to succeed if the > requested attributes matched that of the preexisting mapping? What would be the point of creating such a mapping? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html