> -----Original Message----- > From: Sripathy, Vishwanath > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:23 PM > To: Ghorai, Sukumar; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: csd version check updated to support MMC v4.41 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ghorai, Sukumar > > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 1:51 PM > > To: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Ghorai, Sukumar > > Subject: [PATCH] mmc: csd version check updated to support MMC v4.41 > > > > CSD_STRUCTURE [127:126] describes the version of the CSD structure. > > According to the MMC specificaiton (v4.4.1), 3 is also a valid number. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sukumar Ghorai <s-ghorai@xxxxxx> > > --- > > Tested on omap4430 ES2.0 > > > > drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > > index 89f7a25..525af33 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c > > @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_csd(struct mmc_card *card) > > * v1.2 has extra information in bits 15, 11 and 10. > > */ > > csd_struct = UNSTUFF_BITS(resp, 126, 2); > > - if (csd_struct != 1 && csd_struct != 2) { > > + if (csd_struct > 3) { > > Can't csd_struct be 0? If so then your new check will break right? [Ghorai] 0 to 3 are the valid numbers. > > > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: unrecognised CSD structure version %d\n", > > mmc_hostname(card->host), csd_struct); > > return -EINVAL; > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
