On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > A few comments: > > > > Your "add runtime PM support at bus-level" series has a unstated > > dependency on this patch. If you fix one minor issue (below), it's > > probably easiest if you merge it with that other series to avoid > > cross-dependencies. > > If I switch (back) to just using pm_runtime_* API in the system PM > path _noirq methods, then rather than setting this flag at the > omap_device level, drivers that want to prevent this can simply > do a runtime_pm_get_sync() if they want to prevent a bus-level > suspend. > > Any thoughts/objectsion to that? Sounds fine to me. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
