Hi! (ok, so I'm little late to the party). > > Nonsense, if we want to push the system into suspend from the idle > > state we can do that. It's just not implemented and we've never tried > > to do it as it requires a non trivial amount of work, but I have done > > it on an ARM two years ago as a prove of concept and it works like a > > charm. > > ACPI provides no guarantees about what level of hardware functionality > remains during S3. You don't have any useful ability to determine which > events will generate wakeups. And from a purely practical point of view, We'll need ACPI extensions, then (or very conservative drivers). suspend blockers do *not* help here. > since the latency is in the range of seconds, you'll never have a low > enough wakeup rate to hit it. I did 'sleepy linux' prototype on PC, and yes I was able to get to 'once in 5 seconds' wakeup rate... good enough... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
