Re: SDHC card affected by preemption model in 2.6.35

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:13 +0530, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 20:58 +0530, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> >> Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > HW: Beagleboard rev. C2 and C4
>> >> > Processor: OMAP3
>> >> > Kernel: 2.6.35-rc2
>> >> > Driver: mmci-omap-hs
>> >> >
>> >> > I am faced with an SDHC card problem on a beagleboard.  Some cards
>> >> > cannot be initialized on startup while others work perfectly.  I tracked
>> >> > the issue down to one single kernel config: PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY.
>> >> >
>> >> > When going from PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY to PREEMPT_NONE the problem goes away.
>> >> >
>> >> > When booting, a failing card (PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY) will output the
>> >> > following:
>> >> > [ 2.283355] mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising SD card
>> >> >
>> >> > I have also seen transfer errors such as this one:
>> >> > [ 105.343780] mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 798431, nr
>> >> > 26, card status 0xc00
>> >> >
>> >> > When working properly (PREEMPT_NONE), you get:
>> >> > [   27.026519] mmc0: new high speed SDHC card at address 0007
>> >> > [   27.075775] mmcblk0: mmc0:0007 SD08G 7.49 GiB
>> >> >
>> >> > We seem to have a little timing problem - has anyone seen the same
>> >> > issue ?  Can driver "mmci-omap-hs" actually work under
>> >> > PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks, Mathieu.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I will check this out - not tested with PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY so far.
>> >> If it's not too much trouble, can you provide a log with CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG ?
>> >> Also, some details about the failing card would be helpful.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Venkat.
>> >
>> > Venkat,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately enabling CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG doesn't yield more information -
>> > the error message is the same and no additional output shows on the
>> > console.
>> >
>> > As for the cards, had failures with 3 different manufacturer:
>> > - Patriot Memory, MicroSD card, 8GB, class 4, SDHC.
>> > - Kinston, 4GB, class 6, SDHC.
>> > - Sandisk, 4GB, Class 2, SDHC.
>> >
>> > I am more than willing to test kernels for you if need be.
>> >
>> > Thanks, Mathieu.
>> >
>>
>> For MMC/SD logs to be sent to the console, you need to
>> a) "echo 8 > /proc/sys/kernel/printk" in the shell and
>> b) insert the card
>>
>> If you are booting from the card itself, then this won't work and
>> DEBUG_LL has to be enabled (in addition to CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG)
>>
>> Apologies - I should have explained this initially.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Venkat.
>
> Venkat,
>
> I am indeed booting from the card itself, making things more difficult.
> DEBUG_LL has been configured since the very beginning and still not much
> to look at on the console.  To see something I had to pass loglevel=8 on
> the kernel command line.  At that point there is tones of stuff coming
> out and the card is initialized properly, which points to a timing
> issue.
>
> Since I couldn't reproduce the failure when debug messages are enabled,
> I turned them back off and started to instrument the code on the hunt
> for the failure.
>
> I have cornered the source of the problem in
> "drivers/mmc/core/sd_ops.c", function "mmc_sd_switch".  When the kernel
> is configured with PREEMPT_NONE, the value of "data.error" is set to "0"
> after "mmc_wait_for_req" returns.  When PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is configured,
> "data.error" gets set to "-110" upon "mmc_wait_for_req" returning, which
> prevent the remaining of the configuration to take place.
>

-110 = -ETIMEDOUT.
The error is set from omap_hsmmc.c line 1029, when the controller
returns a DATA_TIMEOUT error.
This can happen for any mmc_wait_for_req() call, not just in mmc_sd_switch().

A simple workaround is to increase the timeout value, as below. Could
you please try with this patch ?
Yes, it's a debugging hack and not the right solution.
[I have so far not reproduced the problem with my setup. Still trying..]

----
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
index b032828..9ca399e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
@@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ omap_hsmmc_prepare_data(struct omap_hsmmc_host
*host, struct mmc_request *req)

        OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, BLK, (req->data->blksz)
                                        | (req->data->blocks << 16));
-       set_data_timeout(host, req->data->timeout_ns, req->data->timeout_clks);
+       set_data_timeout(host, 100000000U, 0);

        if (host->use_dma) {
                ret = omap_hsmmc_start_dma_transfer(host, req);
----

  This provides a good 100ms window for delays due to scheduling variations.
I have to still find out which section is sensitive to it.
Regards,
Venkat.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux