On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Right, so the sooner we make it easier for the drivers to use the kernel >> as their main repository, the better. > > Yep, the fastest way is to provide two stub inlines in pm.h and let > the driver flood come in. As mentioned previously, we didn't know this was an option (stubs without an implementation behind them). If it is, and thus we can simplify the driver merging process short-term while sorting out a long-term implementation or replacement for suspend blockers, then I think we're making real progress. There is no reason that drivers that support suspend blockers cannot (or should not) support regular suspend/resume or runtime suspend/resume, so that shouldn't be a worry. The various operating modes complement, not compete with each other (we want the lowest possible power consumption in all states, be that fully active, fully suspended, or anything in between -- I think everyone involved agrees with this). > I think all of us involved in that can do with a break, where we sit > back, calm down and rethink w/o time pressure. Total agreement. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
