On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:47:09 +0300 Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I like the following naming: > omap_mcbsp_hwrule_min_buffersize() > omap_mcbsp_hwrule_max_periodsize() > Looks clear to me. > Also, I think there is no point to limit the lower period size in threshold mode > to 32, so I will remove that as well I think. > What was the reason why period size cannot be bigger than threshold? This constraint was there before your patch but I don't remember reason for it. Should it be opposite that period size cannot be smaller than threshold? -- Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
