* Cory Maccarrone <darkstar6262@xxxxxxxxx> [100529 06:56]: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > * Cory Maccarrone <darkstar6262@xxxxxxxxx> [100309 15:38]: > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Does your system boot without any patches if DEBUG_LL is not set > > > > in your .config? > > > > > > No, it doesn't. Seems like the debugging code is still trying to run, > > > even disabled. If I add in that check, it'll boot with DEBUG_LL not > > > set, but won't without that. > > > > Sorry for the delay on this. How about with the following patch with > > DEBUG_LL not set? > > > > Note that this is using the shift register now too. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tony > > Sorry I took so long on this one. This patch worked beautifully for > me on the latest kernel tree. Any chance of it getting in for one of > the RCs of this next kernel? Yeah this we should be able to merge as a fix. Can I add your Testedy-by to the patch? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
