On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:27 -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > From my reading of this thread, there's a lot of overlap between > suspendblockers and constraints. Many use cases are served equally > well with one or the other, If using suspend-blockers, Please explain to me how: - I will avoid the cpu going into some idle state for which the wakeup latency is larger than my RT app fancies? - to avoid some tasks from being serviced by the filesystems whilst others are? (ionice on steroids). - does my sporadic task (with strict bandwidth budget) not suffer bandwidth inversion? suspend blockers do a bit of each of that, but none of it in a usable fashion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
