On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:41:23 +0100 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:37:13AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > The other vendors appear to be managing nicely without magic blockers. I > > conjecture therefore there are other solutions. > > Actually, no. A badly behaved application will kill the N900's battery > life. Nobody else has "managed nicely" - they've just made life harder > for application developers and users, which may have something to do > with the relative levels of market adoption of Maemo and Android. I'm > not aware of any form of resource management framework in MeeGo either, > so as far as I know it'll have exactly the same problem. Maemo has battery management applications. Right now they show you what is going on but haven't gone to a pop-up 'XYZ is eating all your battery' kill it behaviour. The information is there. If my phone eventually becomes a 1GB RAM PC class system I will be running PC class apps on it and I will be migrating virtual machines to and from my phone which have no idea about the device properties of each device they migrate to and from. Be that as it may the question of how you manage a naughty app is a good one. Historically we've managed them for network abuse, memory abuse, cpu use abuse, access rights, but not yet power. Whether that looks like setrlimit(pid, LIMIT_CHARGE, 150mWH); or setrlimit(pid, LIMIT_POWER, 150mW); or something else is the question. I rather like the above but I don't see how to implement them nicely at the moment. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
