Hi Felipe, On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Every time the MM application calls proc_map to map >> a memory area, remember the details of that mapping, >> together with the related page structures. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> If you want, you can also reach me at < ohadb at ti dot com >. > >> @@ -948,6 +949,7 @@ static dsp_status bridge_dev_create(OUT struct wmd_dev_context **ppDevContext, >> status = DSP_EMEMORY; >> goto func_end; >> } >> + >> status = cfg_get_host_resources((struct cfg_devnode *) >> drv_get_first_dev_extension(), >> &resources); > > Completely unrelated change. Moreover, this creates conflicts on > future commits since that code is gone. Which change are you referring to ? This is merely a newline :) Or are you referring to something else ? Thanks, Ohad. > > -- > Felipe Contreras > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
