* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100512 15:19]: > > I'd have thought that sysfs was an appropriate place for this info. > Perhaps under /sys/devices/platform? Or /sys/devices/system? Peter's > original patch didn't tell us where in the hierarchy the file was > placed, nor why it was placed there, not what its contents look like. > But crappy changelogs are the norm :( To me both proc and sys work, I'm fine either way. > The objections stated in this email: > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg17630.html > appear to still apply to this version of the patches? > > Kevin didn't explain why he said "Please export these via debugfs". > Tony didn't clearly explain why he said "I don't think we want to > export unique chip identifiers by default". The issue I had was with the unique silicon ID getting exposed by default to avoid the Pentium id number situation :) It's now handled with a Kconfig and cmdline option, basically the same way as the id on x86. So the issues in the email thread above are sorted out. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
