On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:39:26AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Looks good with Jarkko's comment. > However, I'd like to ask Tony, Liam, Jarkko, and Mark the following: > Would it make sense to use the alsa tree for OMAP McBSP related patches, while > keeping l-o in CC off course. We've had to do this a few times in the past due to the way the code is split between the two areas. If it makes everyone's life easier I've got no problem with it, though I'll say my standard thing about it being better to keep them on a branch by themselves which can be pulled into both trees in case of any merge issues. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
