* Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100510 08:09]: > Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > * Varadarajan, Charulatha <charu@xxxxxx> [100506 23:52]: > >> Tony/ Kevin, > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Varadarajan, Charulatha > >> > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:25 PM > >> > To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; paul@xxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; > >> > khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Varadarajan, Charulatha > >> > Subject: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way > >> > > >> > This patch series implements GPIO as an early platform driver. > >> > It makes OMAP2PLUS specific GPIO to get adapted to HWMOD FW. > >> > OMAP1 specific GPIO is implemented as early platform device. > >> > > >> > This patch series is created on "origin/pm-wip/hwmods". > >> > >> Planning to send few more patches for adapting some other > >> drivers to HWMOD FW. > >> Which tree should those patches be created on? > >> LO mainline? or hwmods branch? or runtime branch? > > > > All the patches should be against the most recent tag > > in Linus' mainline tree, currently v2.6.34-rc6. > > > > If there are some dependencies to other patches, we need > > to get those upstream immediately. > > Please use pm-wip/runtime, which is currently based on v2.6.34-rc6 > + PM changes already submitted for 2.6.35 (3 patches) That's for the "few more patches for adapting some other drivers", not for the GPIO patches, right? AFAIK, the GPIO patches should not have dependencies to the pm-wip. Kevin, let me know if you got some things ready to go that can be pulled into omap-for-linus. > In addition, this has the in-progress UART + MMC hwmod changes. Sounds like those are not ready to go yet then. So I guess it's currently only your pm-next that's ready to go? Cheers, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
