Re: [PATCH 1/4] omap: mailbox: convert rwlocks to spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> rwlocks are slower and have potential starvation issues
> therefore spinlocks are generally preferred.
>
> see also: http://lwn.net/Articles/364583/
>
> Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kanigeri Hari <h-kanigeri2@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx>

There's no cover letter, so I'll comment here.

What about these patches?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/31208

They are needed for dspbridge... AFAIK the only real user for omap mailbox.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux