Op 2 mei 2010, om 17:58 heeft Felipe Contreras het volgende geschreven: > > I also have these changes in one of my trees backported from Tomi > Valkeinen's tree. I'm attaching the diff; some of these are cosmetic, > but I think the gpio changes make sense, although I don't know if > omap_mux_init_gpio is really needed. > > I think the current proposed patch should go in already, I don't know > what we are waiting for. > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c > > +#if 0 > + /* is this really needed? */ > + omap_mux_init_gpio(beagle_dvi_device.reset_gpio, OMAP_PIN_INPUT); > +#endif > r = gpio_request(beagle_dvi_device.reset_gpio, "DVI reset"); > > - omap_mux_init_gpio(170, OMAP_PIN_INPUT); > - gpio_request(170, "DVI_nPD"); > - /* REVISIT leave DVI powered down until it's needed ... */ > - gpio_direction_output(170, true); > - I have a similar change queued since the new beagle xM moves DVI reset to gpio129, but I'm holding off on sending beagle patches here till the hardware design is finalized. regards, Koen-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
