* Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> [100401 05:29]: > Hi Hiroshi, > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > > > From: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: mailbox initialization for all omap versions > > Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:23:36 +0300 (EEST) > > > > > From: ext Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: mailbox initialization for all omap versions > > > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:52:04 +0200 > > > > > >> * Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx> [100329 02:05]: > > >>> From: "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx> > > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: mailbox initialization for all omap versions > > >>> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:01:45 +0200 > > >>> > > > >>> > in that case, wouldn't it be better to split that into > > >>> > arch/arm/omap1/mbox.c arch/arm/omap2/mbox24xx.c > > >>> > arch/arm/omap2/mbox34xx.c arch/arm/omap2/mbox44xx.c ?? > > >>> > > > >>> > that way we don't need ifdefs on the code and we will only compile what > > >>> > we really need. > > >>> > > >>> This is feasible. > > >>> But I'm not so sure whether adding 4 new files with around only 10 > > >>> lines code is acceptable or not. > > >>> > > >>> Tony, any comment on the above? > > >>> > > >>> Basically there could be the case we need all resources if we want to > > >>> support omap1, 2, 3 and 4 at the same time, and the appropriate one > > >>> will be chosen at run time by CPUID. I'm not sure how mature "omap > > >>> multi arch" support is practically, but it's better to keep it as much > > >>> as possbile. > > >> > > >> I like Felipe's suggestion of adding devices2420.c, devices34xx.c, > > >> devices44xx.c or similar. Then do the device init from those with > > >> a arch_initcall that returns immediately if not running on the right > > >> soc. > > > > > > Ok, let's procced with this. I'll post something later. > > > > > > > Something like the following? > > Is it possible to try a hwmod conversion of this? Similar to the UART, > HSMMC, etc. work that Kevin has queued in his pm-wip/hwmods branch: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pm-wip/hwmods > > Otherwise this will all have to be redone when the mailbox is converted to > use hwmod. Sounds like a plan to me. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
