"Gopinath, Thara" <thara@xxxxxx> writes: >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>>Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:06 PM >>>To: Gopinath, Thara >>>Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paul@xxxxxxxxx; Menon, Nishanth; Sripathy, Vishwanath; Sawant, Anand; >>>Cousson, Benoit >>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP3: PM: OMAP3630 support for smartreflex driver >>> >>>Thara Gopinath <thara@xxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> This patch series adds support for the updated 45nm smrtrelfex IP >>>> supported in OMAP3630 and OMAP4 in the smartreflex driver and >>>> adds support to enable smartreflex autocompensation for OMAP3630 >>>> using test nvalues. >>>> >>>> This patch series is based on the following patch series/patches >>>> for proper functionality. >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=126700378625593&w=2 >>>> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77739/ >>>> >>>> This patch series has been tested on OMAP3630 SDP board with >>>> CONFIG_OMAP_SMARTREFLEX_TESTING option enabled in the menuconfig. >>>> >>>> This patch series has been based on Kevin's PM tree >>>> origin/pm-wip-opp branch >>> >>>It appears to also depend on the previous SR rework series. It >>>doesn't apply directly to pm-wip-opp. > > Hi Kevin, > > The patch/series dependency mentions the previous SR rework patch series in the above line. > No, it only mentions the PM branch + pm-wip-opp branch. I saw mention of the previous SR rework series in description. >>> >>>> and on adea81232e8fc82334bca3707efa23dc854f29fc commit id. >>> >>>This commit is a rather old version of pm-wip-opp, please refresh >>>against current. > > I will do this. I will send out a V2 for both this series and the earlier smartreflex rework series. > Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
