For omap4 case, this was wrongly writing GPIO_LEVELDETECTx
registers with OMAP24XX_ offset and OMAP4_ offset.
Bug introduced in commit:
commit 3f1686a9bfe74979c6ad538c78039730f665f77e
Author: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Feb 15 09:27:25 2010 -0800
omap: Fix gpio.c for multi-omap for omap4
Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
index 337199e..76a347b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
@@ -2140,18 +2140,18 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_retention(void)
if (gen) {
u32 old0, old1;
- if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
+ if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
old0 = __raw_readl(bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
old1 = __raw_readl(bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
- __raw_writel(old0 | gen, bank->base +
+ __raw_writel(old0 | gen, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
- __raw_writel(old1 | gen, bank->base +
+ __raw_writel(old1 | gen, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
- __raw_writel(old0, bank->base +
+ __raw_writel(old0, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0);
- __raw_writel(old1, bank->base +
+ __raw_writel(old1, bank->base +
OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1);
}
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
