* Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [100225 10:51]: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@xxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:14 AM > > To: Thomas Weber; Aguirre, Sergio > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Russell King; Kevin Hilman; Shilimkar, Santosh; Pandita, Vikram; > > Syed, Rafiuddin; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thomas Weber > > Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH/RFC] OMAP2: serial.c: Fix number of uarts in early_init > > > > * Thomas Weber <swirl@xxxxxx> [100225 01:36]: > > > > > > The omap_serial_early_init prints the following errors: > > > > > > Could not get uart4_ick > > > Could not get uart4_fck > > > > > > because all the uarts available in omap_uart[] will be initialized. > > > Only omap4430 and omap3630 have 4 uarts at the moment. > > > This patch reduces the number of uarts when cpu is not omap4430 or > > > omap3630. > > > > ..and I only patched omap_serial_init and forgot about > > the omap_serial_early_init.. > > > > Looks good to me, Sergio, care to test and Ack this? Also, sounds > > like we still need to patch omap4 for uart4 for the clocks. > > > Clocks will be take care automatically by "nr_ports" for omap4 too > with this patch. Below clock changes are just cosmetic ones, isn't it ? > > Am I missing something? Yes sorry, I'm referring to "[RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP3630: UART4 startup" series to fix the uart4 issues for 3630, not omap4. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
