> -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob john [mailto:jacob.john74@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:16 AM > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: About multicore OMAP > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh > <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: > > John, > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > >> Shilimkar, Santosh > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:01 PM > >> To: Jacob john > >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: RE: About multicore OMAP > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Jacob john [mailto:jacob.john74@xxxxxxxxx] > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:51 PM > >> > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > >> > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > Subject: Re: About multicore OMAP > >> > > >> > It's Blaze with two lcd's and pico, looks great. Can I have this > >> > linux-omap kernel running on OMAP4?, plus I'm looking for SMP > >> > benchmark results etc. > >> > > >> Linux-omap kernel with omap_4430sdp_defconfig will boot on blaze with SMP. This > >> won't have lot of driver support as such currently. Also L2 cache support is in > >> on the way to make it to mainline as well. You should be able to play with this > >> with some basic benchmark test related to CPU. > >> > >> Display , Audio, Pico, keypad, touchscreeen etc drivers are available with the > >> release and you should be able get more details from the TI contact person who > >> gave you the blaze. You can also get the performance numbers from same source > >> > > If you need the full kernel with all the drivers I mentioned above, you can use > > below git. > > http://dev.omapzoom.org/?p=integration/kernel-omap4.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/L24.4 > > Good help so far......, wondering why two trees for OMAP4, tell me the > diff b/n this list and the zoom. > is there a different mailing list for zoom? confusing... and I am > sorry....thanks for the pointers > The mailing list is only one (Linux-omap). There is no difference. Linux-omap tree is almost mainline equivalent from omap4 point of view. The features are developed on the tree I mentioned above. The tested features will be up-streamed after rebasing one by one. You will find only upstreamed/lined-up features in linux-omap tree. Regards, Santosh ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
