Hi Benoit, > -----Original Message----- > From: Cousson, Benoit > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 7:36 AM > To: Shilimkar, Santosh; Anna, Suman; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx; Clark, Rob; Kanigeri, Hari; C.A, Subramaniam > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] omap: mailbox: correct OMAP4 reset logic > > Hi Suman, > > > > Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve > Loubet. 036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920 > > -----Original Message----- > > >From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > >owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shilimkar, Santosh > >Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 7:53 PM > >To: Anna, Suman; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Cc: Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx; Clark, Rob; Kanigeri, Hari; C.A, Subramaniam > >Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] omap: mailbox: correct OMAP4 reset logic > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > >owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anna, > >> Suman > >> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:37 AM > >> To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx; Clark, Rob; Kanigeri, Hari; C.A, > Subramaniam > >> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] omap: mailbox: correct OMAP4 reset logic > >> > >> From 2488815a9facca29e2da3ddd279de441a5de6a58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> > >> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:55:29 -0600 > >> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] omap: mailbox: correct OMAP4 reset logic > >> > >> OMAP4 mailbox has a different register set. There is > >> no MAILBOX_SYSSTATUS register. The reset is indicated > >> with the SOFTRESET bit of the MAILBOX_SYSCONFIG register > >> itself. This bit should read 0 for a successful Reset. > >> Also, the SOFTRESET bit occupies bit0 and not bit1 as with > >> previous generations. > > This is due to the new standard defined for OMAP4 IPs and well explain by > Thara in a recently posted patch to handle that smoothly using hwmod. > [PATCH V4] OMAP3: hwmod: support to specify the offset position of various > SYSCONFIG register bits. > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg23509.html > > Is there a reason to not convert the mailbox driver to use hwmod? > It will avoid you to handle that in the mailbox driver code, whereas the > hwmod framework is already taking care of that. > > Regards, > Benoit > Thanks for the reference. Mailbox driver is yet to migrate to use the new hwmod. It is still based on the old framework. Regards Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
