Re: [PATCH] OMAP: HWMOD: Bug fixes in hwmod structure definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Thara,

some comments.

On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Thara Gopinath wrote:

> This patch corrects the width of some variables in hwmod structures
> where the values to be stored in these variables exceed the current
> field width.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_hwmod.h |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_hwmod.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_hwmod.h
> index 921990e..06a7f20 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_hwmod.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_hwmod.h
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ struct omap_hwmod_sysconfig {
>  	u16 sysc_offs;
>  	u16 syss_offs;
>  	u8 idlemodes;
> -	u8 sysc_flags;
> +	u16 sysc_flags;

This part is fine.

>  	u8 clockact;
>  };
>  
> @@ -280,9 +280,9 @@ struct omap_hwmod_sysconfig {
>  struct omap_hwmod_omap2_prcm {
>  	s16 module_offs;
>  	u8 prcm_reg_id;
> -	u8 module_bit;
> +	u32 module_bit;
>  	u8 idlest_reg_id;
> -	u8 idlest_idle_bit;
> +	u32 idlest_idle_bit;
>  	u8 idlest_stdby_bit;
>  };

This part I don't understand.  These are bit shifts in a 32 bit register, 
e.g., (1 << idlest_idle_bit), so how could these ever exceed 31?


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux