Re: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Add BRD_SLEEP_TRANSITION in PROC_GetState

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/9/2010 1:19 PM, Ramos Falcon, Ernesto wrote:
 From 40d5863c3d3f4091761fef8bff581d2a7b1f32fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ernesto Ramos<ernesto@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:30:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: Add BRD_SLEEP_TRANSITION in PROC_GetState.

When PROC_GetState checks for BRD status it is not taking into account
the state BRD_SLEEP_TRANSITION and it is returning DSP_EFAIL when this
happens, which is wrong. This fix adds this check to return ProcStatus as
PROC_RUNNING and status DSP_SOK when this happens.

Signed-off-by: Ernesto Ramos<ernesto@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@xxxxxx>

Pushed to dspbridge

- omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux