Re: omap3evm: Doesn't boot at 4fa42e46

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This one line change seem to fix the issue on my end

--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static void __init omap_mux_init_list(struct
omap_mux *super
                }
 #endif

-#if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_MUX) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
+#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX
                if (!superset->muxnames || !superset->muxnames[0]) {
                        superset++;
                        continue;

Not sure why DebugFS need to be defined for the muxname check. omap3evm
and zoom2/3 dont have DebugFS enabled by default in defconfig and that
could explain why these platforms not booting up.

A formal patch will follow once I get more confirmations that this
change is working.

 - Ranjith

On Mon, 15-Feb-10 8:56 PM +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:04 PM
>> To: Premi, Sanjeev
>> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: omap3evm: Doesn't boot at 4fa42e46
>>
>> * Premi, Sanjeev <premi@xxxxxx> [100210 09:09]:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>> Premi, Sanjeev
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:34 PM
>>>> To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: omap3evm: Doesn't boot at 4fa42e46
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>>> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>>>> Premi, Sanjeev
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:02 PM
>>>>> To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: omap3evm: Doesn't boot at 4fa42e46
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Just updated my repo to the commit:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit 4fa42e4679324b0e3c54fb509535eea3923ccb63
>>>>> Merge: e599f12 c446167
>>>>> Author: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date:   Thu Feb 4 20:07:44 2010 -0800
>>>>>
>>>>> The kernel builds fine; but doesn't boot on the OMAP3EVM.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been able to trace the code until rest_init(); but 
>>>>> will need to restart debugging.
>>>>> There seems to be an exception during execution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will continue to dig further. This is just an FYI.
>>>>>
>>>> The kernel panics during I2C init in function omap3_evm_i2c_init()
>>>> during this call:
>>>>
>>>>     omap_register_i2c_bus(2, 400, NULL, 0);
>>>>
>>>> I see that there isn't any difference between omap3_evm_i2c_init()
>>>> and omap3430_i2c_init(). Has anyone tried the booting 3430SDP at
>>>> this commit?
>>>>
>>>> ...just trying to understand if this is a board specific issue
>>>> OR is it a generic OMAP3 issue before I try bisect.
>>>>
>>>> ~sanjeev
>>> uImage created with omap3_defconfig at the HEAD boots fine on the
>>> EVM. I couldn't find much differences between this defconfig and
>>> my .config - related to i2c where the failure occurs.
>> Maybe post the diff -u of the configs?
>>  
>>> Unfortunately bisect didn't help much :( I just know the last
>>> commit where the EVM boots fine (with defconfig).
>>>
>>>   9b17b59 : Add devkit8000_defconfig
>>>
>>> Just a snapshot of git-bisect from my command history:
>>>
>>> premi # git-bisect bad f9ffaa9
>>> Some good revs are not ancestor of the bad rev.
>>> git bisect cannot work properly in this case.
>>> Maybe you mistake good and bad revs?
>>> premi #
>>> premi # history | grep bisect | grep good
>>>    512  git-bisect good c6348aa
>>>    518  git-bisect good a9861b5
>>>    523  git-bisect good 9b17b59
>>> premi #
>>> premi # history | grep bisect | grep bad
>>>    507  git-bisect bad 4fa42e4
>>>    533  git-bisect bad 0b421ec
>>>    538  git-bisect bad fc76be4
>>>    543  git-bisect bad 66ddfc6
>>>    547  git-bisect bad f9ffaa9
>>> premi #
>> Can you try bisecting the omap for-next branch starting at
>> 9ba874506b7b3883d78b8cad61eba39c4bb09885?
>>
>> If 9ba874506b7b3883d78b8cad61eba39c4bb09885 does not boot,
>> then you have to start at 4f4e65d2484811210a2826fa9d59712c7fcf1b49.
> 
> Had to step away from the problem fore few days. Started bisecting now.
> 
> ~sanjeev
> 
>> Otherwise you'll end up bisecting all kinds of merges..
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tony
>> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux