On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:14:18 ext Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:49:48 +0000 > > Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I do agree this makes good sense for boards that are very similar and > > have different audio options/config, but in this case the ASoC mach > > drivers are identical (atm). Imo it just makes more sense to keep the > > one Kconfig. > > Yeah, after thinking twice, we don't have zillions of options for e.g. > Intel HDA either. If we ever figure out some common OMAP+TWL4030 > driver, the defconfigs are anyway have to modify so it's better stay > with the original patch: Well, I really doubt that we can find a way to have a common driver for this combination. You can attach quite a big variety of amps to the outputs (some controlled with GPIO, some like the tpa6130 has i2c interface, etc). To have some kind of "infrastructure" to support all of the possible scenarios is just does not worth the effort IMHO. > > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2010-February/025129.h > tml > > Sorry about line noise, Thomas :-) > -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
