On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [100209 14:38]: >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > * Hemanth V <hemanthv@xxxxxx> [100203 02:19]: >> >> From ee48142ddc43129a21676dbb56a83e3e7d8063de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> >> From: Hemanth V <hemanthv@xxxxxx> >> >> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:22:30 +0530 >> >> Subject: [PATCH] Update platform files >> >> >> >> This patch updates platform files for >> >> fifo, slave support >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Hemanth V <hemanthv@xxxxxx> >> > >> > This should get merged via the spi-devel list with the other patches. >> > >> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Personally, I prefer not to carry arch/* changes in my next-spi >> branch, since it means that my pull requests are less obvious for >> Linus and there is greater chance of conflict. >> >> But if you still really want me to merge it through my tree, (or if >> getting the patches out of order will break things) then I'll pick it >> up. Just let me know. > > OK, if you ack it, I'll add the header into omap for-next. That > might break git bisect for some configurations depending in which > order the patches get pulled by Linus.. git bisect breakage is breakage enough. :-) You're right. I should pick this one up. I can see that now that I've had my tea and I'm no longer grumpy. > I guess eventually this header should not live under plat. Any reason the header cannot be moved to include/linux/spi/ now? g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
