On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:52:26PM +0200, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mark Brown > > The bodge I'm thinking of would do something like log an error and > substitute in a dummy regulator when regulator_get() would have failed > so that the driver sees behaviour equivalent to the stubbed regulator > API if the bodge is active. A central thing seems much more sensible > here - there's nothing specific to this driver going on here and having > the API behave in a consistent manner seems good. I agree that such approach have more sense than checking for -ENODEV in each and every driver that uses the regulator framework. I just wonder, if there should be some mechanism that can switch the substitution of the dummy regulators on and off. And if yes, how should the platform code communicate with the regulator core the need for such dummy regulators... > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Sincerely Yours, Mike. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
