Thursday 04 February 2010 10:58:12 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 17:21 +0100, ext Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 21:25 +0100, ext Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > >> Support for RGB444 (12-bit) pixel format has been introduced into > > >> omapfb/lcdc by Mark Underwood on 2006-05-26 (commit > > >> f74edb6668aad9fc8e81585861b18f996c78a574) in preparation for Amstrad > > >> Delta (E3) videophone LCD display support. > > > > > > I haven't seen any comments on this. Shall I apply it to my tree? > > > > > > Tomi > > > > Tomi, > > > > I'm not sure if I am the right person to decide whether my patch should > > be accepted or not and what tree it should be applied to, but if you are > > willing to take it than I'm happy. > > > > BTW, could you also consider taking my other long waiting patch that > > touches drivers/video/omap: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/66649/ ? > > Your patch was marked as RFC, so I thought it wasn't the final version. Tomi, Thanks for your explanation. It looks like I might not understand exactly how a patch with an RFC tag is supposed to be processed. Can I assmue that next time, when there are no comments to my RFC, I should just resubmit without RFC tag? > Both patches seem to apply cleanly to my tree, and look fine to me, so > I'll take them both. Thanks :) Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html