On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:51:16 +0200 (EET) Ilkka Koskinen <ikoskine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Set applies well on top of vanilla but the patch 1 doesn't apply on > > linux-omap due commit bcbb73c6fe8544bb50cddb8b5df0e2fcbb08b4b0. > > I guess that's the case, since I just tested the patches on top > linux-omap-2.6 master and sound tree... > Yeah, McBSP is always bit problematic as it spreads between two subsystems. Some recent patches has been pushed via ALSA tree but now that would lead to conflict. > > I was thinking that it makes sense to base the patch 1 on top of McBSP > > register cache patches from Janusz Krzysztofik after Tony applies > > them (+ having cache for ST regs). That avoid conflicts in mainline > > and makes the sidetone also ready for McBSP context save/restore > > functionality. > > I'm ok with that. So would you suggest me to prepare the cache patch for > ST registers? If so, would it be possible to make it as follow-up patch? > That's ok. As there is no currently implementation for context save/restore in McBSP, the follow-up patch is even better than doing everything in the patch 2. -- Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
