RE: [PATCH] omap3: pm: cpufreq: populate l3 opp1 again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >IMHO the best way to unconfuse readers is to remove the entry.
> 
> The confusion is due to a mismatch between public TRM/white paper and
> current code, so maybe a simple comment on top of the
> omap34xx_l3_rate_table will be enough.
> 
But why do we want to keep an OPP that will never be used? 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux